M25 LogoM25 Consortium of Academic Libraries
M25 Home
Steering Group Thursday 28 September 2006

Steering Group Meeting Minutes

Note: The following minutes are approved.

Notes for the meeting held at Wellcome Trust Headquarters

Present: Nick Bevan, Mary Davies, J. Adam Edwards, Robert Hall, Caroline Lloyd, William Marsterson, Frances Norton, Anne Poulson, Maureen Wade, John Wolstenholme, Jean M Yeoh and Genein Cox

Fiona O’Brien (LLDA) was in attendance for item 2.

1. Apologies for absence and welcome to new members

1.i The following apologies were noted: Nicky Kershaw, Maire Lanigan, Christine Wise

1.ii Genein Cox was welcomed as the new Administrative Assistant to the Consortium.


2. Regional Collaboration (LLDA)

FO reported that LLDA may organise a seminar or roundtable later in the year to discuss the development of public library policy. She  also reported that LLDA’s director and CW from M25 attended  an update / roundtable discussion hosted by MLA London regarding London 2012. The prospectus for London’s archives, libraries and museums has now been drafted.

LLDA has participated in a survey regarding the future of Revealweb, the national database of accessible formats. The consultants have been in touch with John Gilby to explore the needs of visually impaired students and researchers. National MLA funded a feasibility study, project managed by LLDA to examine arguments and scope a possible single membership card for London’s libraries. Good progress is being made and a report is expected to be drafted for steering group consideration in mid-October, with final publication in November.

Plans continue to migrate Libraries and learners in London to Inspire. A national database of library collections to support Inspire is being built in the Findit website. LLDA has been working along with  the M25 Collaboration and Partnership Working Group and with John Gilby to determine the best way to contribute London data to Findit.


3. Minutes

3.i The minutes from the Steering Group meeting held on Thursday 6th July were approved.

3.ii Matters Arising:

Institutional Repositories: WM reported that the RDWG looked at the terms of the recent JISC call for proposals on institutional repositories and did not see any room for making a bid led by the Consortium.

4. Membership Applications

The following institutions have shown interest in joining M25.

? University of Bedfordshire
? American Intercontinental Library
? Ravensborne College of Art
? Trinity College of Music

It was agreed that the University of Bedfordshire met the requirements for membership to the Consortium and should be admitted. Members will be asked to confirm this at the January Consortium meeting.

5. Review of Working Groups and M25 future developments

5.i Review of current working groups and discussion of future developments

Working Groups

RH introduced his paper and thanked members for attending meetings and contributing to production of the document. RH noted that working groups had grown up over the years and had done good work, but it was time for a review of groups, including their constitution and membership arrangements. Jean Yeoh commented that it was a valuable and well worth exercise.

 Group  Recommendation  Future On-going Action to be taken
 Advocacy Working Group  Renamed: “Marketing and Communication Working Group” ? Advocacy work to be covered by the Collaboration and Partnership group
? An annual marketing plan to be produced
 Collaboration and Partnership Working Group  Continue ? Group to reduce number of bodies with which it engages and focus on key ones
? To consider relationship with LLDA and their relevance to the work of M25
 CPD25 Training and Development for HE Libraries  Continue To investigate further administrative support to enable more activities to take place
 Disabled and Special Needs Support Working Group  Discontinue

? To undertake one final piece of work in the area of access to member libraries for disabled students and based around an access card or entitlement.
? An annual Exchange of Experience event, to be organised by CPD25

 Disaster Management Working Group  Discontinue ? To complete work on re-design of the Disaster Plan web pages to fit new visual identity
? Annual report to be made to the Steering Group by one of the SG members (someone  to be nominated)

? Annual Exchange of Experience event to be organised by CPD25

 London Health Libraries and M25 Consortium Joint Working Group  Continue  Maintain a watching brief in the area of access for placement students and in service charters, to identify how it should best proceed.
 Quality Working Group  Continue  Group to work up a proposal around two or three areas of work for presentation at a future SG meeting; proposal to include any resource requirements.
 Resource Discovery Working Group  Continue ? To investigate other activities such as developments in institutional repositories

? Continue to seek ways to responding to JISC calls

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Constitutional Arrangements

RH explained the need to have a transparent set of procedures for membership of Working Groups, to maintain a culture of openness and provide opportunities for a wide range of staff across the Consortium to take part.

JY noted that it would be better if people could remain on the Task Groups of CPD25 for more than the recommended three consecutive years because this is an area that requires specialist expertise. JW reiterated this point for his Health working group. It was agreed that there could be flexibility and that CPD25 was a special case, as it provided one of the Consortium’s main services.

AP asked if there could be some guidelines as to the number of people serving on a working group. RH recommended 8-9 persons for the effective working of a group, but this should be at the discretion of the Chair. It was also agreed that the final decision on appointment of members of groups should be made by the Chair, in consultation with another member of the Steering Group.
 
It was agreed that three years was a reasonable period for membership of a group, but there should also be flexibility, to allow for retention of members with particular expertise. JW suggested that it would be a healthy practice to do a review of the working groups every three years.

New Activities

Database of Expertise: This idea had been suggested a number of times, so it was felt it should be explored further. AE suggested that it was important to distinguish between what is considered expertise and alternatively, experience. It was agreed that what was required was probably a database of experience”– allowing people to find out which libraries had particular experience of relevance to them. NB suggested that it could be a service available to members only – increasing subscribers’ value for subscription. JY cautioned that there needed to be a mechanism in place for updating the database.
Action: RH/MW/NB to consider this idea further and report back to December SG meeting.

Consortial Purchasing: It was suggested that a small sub-group be set up to investigate what regional purchasing consortia already provide that is of interest to libraries and make this information available to members. The group could also identify gaps and report back to the SG. The SG might then want to lobby the consortia, such as SUPC, LUPC, to undertake further work of interest to M25 members. 
Action: RH/MW/NB to consider this idea further and report back to December SG meeting.

Research: This proposal involved work to identify and publicise research collections in Consortium member libraries, particularly those not thought of primarily as research libraries. AP suggested that an early discussion with CURL on  this would be useful. She suggested that in her capacity as member of the CURL Board she might be able to make some recommendations. NB suggested that we need to think initially about the market for such a service. CL suggested it could be an extension of InforM25 services and include information about institutional repositories of research papers.
Action: RH/MW/NB to consider this idea further and report back to December SG meeting.

5.ii  Process for selection of Chair of CPD25
 
As JY had been the Chair of CPD25 since its inception, no procedure existed for selection of the Chair. JY agreed to assist with a job description for the post.  CL suggested that we build into the JD, the fact that it is a requirement that the individual’s employer gave them the necessary flexibility to get the work done. AE suggested that some sort of incentive be given to the organisation by the Consortium to ensure this. It was agreed that the Consortium will waive the CPD25 subscription for the institution of the Chair.
Action: MW to bring paper on CPD25 Chair selection procedure to January Consortium meeting

RH proposed that the SG have an annual Planning Day, to be held in the spring, to allow for input to action plan and budget proposals for the following year. This was agreed.
Action: RH/MW organise a planning day in Spring 2007

6. Progress Reports on Action Plan 2006/07
Reports noted

7. Annual Report Update

FN reported that the M25 Annual Report for 2005/06 was ready for images and printing. She thanked all who contributed to the document. She stated that colour proofs should be ready in 10 days to 2 weeks for RH’s final approval .
Action: FN to forward proofs to RH for approval


8. Programme for January 2007 Business Meeting

MW reintroduced the theme of the January 23rd AGM to be held at The British Library, to be “Print to Digital”. Some topics which were suggested included:

• BL Content Strategy
• Web-archiving
• Digital Imaging
• Changing roles of library staff
• Move of government information to the web
• Space and use of space
• Google
• Update of InforM25 – new interface

The program is to be confirmed at the December Steering Group meeting. MW reported that she already contacted some individuals but was open for suggestions of other speakers for the morning session of the event.
Action: MW/GC to continue planning and report back to December SG meeting


9. M25 Access and Borrowing Scheme

CL reported the need to print new M25 cards as the original stock of cards is almost depleted and they carry the old M25 logo.
Action: CL to liaise with GC to get new stock printed.

RH suggested that in the future we include information in the new members packs about the purpose of the M25 cards.


10. Finance

NB reported that invoices had been sent out for 2006/07 subscriptions and payments have begun to come in.

11.  M25 Charitable Status

RH reported that Companies House need the Articles of Association and the Memorandum of Association before we could proceed further. There is a delay in producing these, since there have been small changes which need to be agreed by a majority of Members. As a majority count was not present at this meeting it was suggested by RH that the changes be put to Members at the January meeting. This was agreed.
Action: RH to draft paper for January meeting 

12.  Reports from Working Groups

12.i Reports were noted from the following working groups:

• Advocacy
• CPD25
• Disabled & Special Needs Support
• Disaster Management
• Quality
• Resource Discovery
• London Health Libraries & M25 Joint Working Group
• Systems Team

12.i WM reported on plans for further statistical analysis of the InforM25 services. Currently the most popular service is the Union List of Serials. This prompted some discussion of the impact of the general move to e-journals on the Consortium’s collaborative resource sharing. Where journals are only available electronically, licensing and operational issues such as lack of network access could prevent resource sharing. MW noted that the move towards electronic without print is undermining the resource sharing strategy of the Consortium. NB suggested that it may be an issue for JISC. RDWG were asked to scope the problem and draft a position paper to be brought back to the Steering Group for consideration.
Action: WM to take this issue to RDWG and report back to a future SG meeting.


13. Any other business
AE asked how to obtain access to the M25 archive of photographs. It was agreed to refer this to ML, as chair of the Advocacy Working Group. The question of copyright was raised ; ML would be asked to clarify.
Action: ML to report back to SG on availability of photographs from the M25 archive and to clarify the copyright position


14. Programme of Future Meetings

14.i  The Programme of meetings to note are as follows:

• Steering Group Meeting Tuesday 5 December 2006 - Senate House
• Full Consortium Meeting Tuesday 23 January 2007 - British Library
• Steering Group Meeting Thursday 8 March 2007 - LSE

 

Maureen Wade
Secretary
Thursday 12 October, 2006

 

 

This site contains PDF Documents. You can download Adobe Reader free here:

Get Adobe Reader