Site map
| London Health Libraries & M25 Consortium Joint 14 March 2005 |
Notes from the meeting held at Guys Campus, KCLPresent: Betsy Anagnostelis [BA] - TVU (NCL), Paul Ayris [PA] - UCL (NCL), Melanie Brocklehurst [MB] - LSBU (SEL), Maggie Haines [MH] - KCL (SEL), Paul Hockney [PH] - QM (NEL), Angels Horrocks [AH] - Kingston (SWL), Gary Horrocks [GH] - KCL (SWL), Richard Osborn (Chair) [RO] - NWLSHA, Ray Phillips [RP] - SWLSHA, Cheryl Twomey [CT] - LHL eKAT, Andy Richardson [AR] - LHL eKAT, Anne Weist [AW] - NELSHA, Jane Williamson [JW] - NCLSHA, John wolstenholme [JIW] - TVU (NWL). Apologies: Ruth Fosker [RF] - SELSHA, Janet Smith [JS] - Imperial College & CPD25 (NWL). 1. Discussion on the role and purpose of the group1.1 Relationships with other groupsRO asked the group to brainstorm all the groups that this group needs to link in with both at a London and at a local level. Groups mentioned included:LLUMS - London, CHILL, UMSLG, UHSL, NHS-HE Forum, SCONUL HSG, LKDN, M25 Consortium, London Health Libraries, CILIP-Health Libraries Group and other CILIP special interest groups - Colleges of Further and Higher Education Group , University College & Research Group. There was an extended discussion about the work of some of these groups and how they relate to each other:
1.2 Communication
It was agreed that this group (LHL / M25) needs feedback from all the key national and London Groups. One suggestion was that notes from all relevant meetings should be circulated to this group. 1.3 Joint procurement argumentsIt was agreed that the two distinct funding streams i.e. Department of Health and Department of Education and Science makes joint funding more difficult. If joint purchasing is really going to be pushed forward, the two funding streams need to be brought together. All participants accepted that such a change would not happen without sustained lobbying and clear arguments indicating the benefits of joint procurement.
It was agreed that the group needed to commission a procurement map that builds on the work of John Thornhill. JISC are likely to part fund this work. 1.4 Terms of Reference
It was agreed that the current terms of reference could be more specific and that there should be a stronger link to relevant national groups. Points 3 and 4 could probably be linked. 1.5 CPD25 / LHLCo-operation is good on the LHL CPD Training Group. Janet Smith (JS), CPD25 and Ray Phillips (LHL) organised a very successful joint study day in November. JS is also on the LHL Learner Support Project Steering Group. 1.6. Work plan for the LHL/ M25 GroupFollowing further discussion, it was agreed that the group needed to identify key workstreams. It was agreed that the following 6 areas should be included:
The group agreed to concentrate its future work in these areas. 2. Information update from London Health LibrariesRO distributed copies of the London Health Libraries strategic framework for healthcare library services in London 2005-2008. He briefly went through the mission statement and the 3 key strategic themes, highlighting services that will:
3. Information update from M25UCL is leading on learning repositories for learning objects. The definition and scope of the work is being determined. This M25 repository will possibly link into the JISC funded one. M25 Observer status has been dropped. JIW gave a review of group activity. More details can be found at http://www.m25lib.ac.uk/m25sec/business/workinggroups.htm 4. Outline proposal for the operation of an LHL/ M25 procurement group
This paper was ratified. 5. Dates for future meetings11 July 2005starting with Lunch at 12.30pm. Finish 3.30pm. SELSHA offices, close to Borough Station - further details to follow. 17 October 2005 starting with Lunch at 12.30pm. Finish 3.30pm. TVU. |




